Send As SMS

Sermons at St Paul's

Friday, June 30, 2006

Jesus, the stiller of storms

Sermon preached at St Paul's Church, Oadby
Sunday 25 June 2006
Simon Harvey



There is no audio recording of this sermon, but the text is shown below.

I believe that Jesus’ call to the disciples to push out from the shore, to set sail into less certain waters, is especially relevant to our church right now. I believe that God is calling us to be more mission-minded, more outward-looking, more deliberate and purposeful in the business of evangelism and more serious about living our lives more and more as mature and committed followers of Jesus.


The bible readings used in this sermon are Job 38.1-11 and Mark 5.35-41
.

Let me tell you a little modern parable and see if you spot any connections…

They tell a story, of a remote part of the Newfoundland Coast; a treacherous rocky shore on which many ships have been wrecked. Many souls have been lost in those icy seas.
A small and dedicated band of men decided to station a small rescue boat inside one of the narrow inlets. And they kept watch for ships in distress. The small lifeboat was nothing special – it was anything but comfortable –just big enough to stay afloat in the heavy seas. The first night the lifeboat was called upon it for real action, it went back and forth to a stricken vessel, bringing half-drowned sailors to safety on the shore. And that wasn’t the last time either. The crew were few in number, but what they lacked in manpower and equipment, they made up for in bravery and courage. They simply lived to serve and save others.
After a while though, some improvements were suggested. A bigger boat could accommodate people more easily. So one was ordered. It was a little heavier to steer, but it was still quite effective. The lifeboat crew had grown in number and, between rescue operations, they enjoyed each other’s company and tended to their vessel.
In the long evenings, the crew would gather at the lifeboat and talk, play cards and sing. It became a real place of friendship. Later they made more improvements – electric light, comfortable seats, cupboards for provisions. These made it only slightly harder to set sail in an emergency.
Over the months and years, more people found their way into the company of the lifeboat. People came down to join the crew – people who didn’t ever want to set sail into the icy waters themselves. A replacement boat was ordered – one which could accommodate the whole lifeboat community. A toilet was fitted. A cooker was installed. Beds were made so that people could stay overnight. The well-stocked bar was very popular. The big lifeboat could still go out to rescue sailors in peril, but somehow, the people inside didn’t seem to look out as often as they used to.
No one quite remembers the day when the lifeboat became a houseboat. It didn’t seem so much of a big deal at the time. A permanent gangway made access much easier. Heavy mooring ropes kept the boat safe and secure, even if they made a quick launch impossible. Permanent electrical wiring was much more convenient than using the little on-board generator. A solid roof and curtains at the windows shut out the noise of the wind when the gales blew and the heaters kept the inside snug and warm even in the fiercest storm. It was still called a lifeboat, of course. But no one could quite remember the last time the boat set sail.
Now all along that coast, the same thing happened. Today there are lots of comfortable houseboats, some are full, most are half-empty. But there are no real lifeboats to set sail. No boats to set out and find those in distress. no one keeping lookout to seek the lost.

What a tragedy! How could people allow it? Vessels originally designed to set sail into stormy seas to rescue the those calling for help no longer used for their true purpose?
The parallel of course, is for us to work out. The metaphor isn’t a perfect one, but the church is a kind of lifeboat, isn’t it? You’ve got seats in God’s ship. And this is a ship with a purpose; she wasn’t built as a houseboat. Of course, through this ship, the work of saving the lost is God’s work. But we, the church, are called to do our part too. To be available at a moment’s notice, ready to go. What a mission!
Incidentally, the part of the church building you’re sitting in is the nave. It’s the word for ship. (Navis. Navy).
Sadly, many church communities have allowed themselves to settle for a less demanding mission. There’s always the temptation to turn our attention inward, to focus on getting our little ship just the way we like it. To become a comfortable houseboat, safely moored in quiet waters. To neglect the distress calls outside. I wrote a letter for the parish magazine this month which relates to this and I’ve received a lot of encouraging feedback. (more copies for St Paul’s people). My basic point is that church has a purpose – a mission purpose – beyond making us feel better about ourselves. Being part of a Spirit-led church, available for mission, sometimes means that the Christian community is a demanding place to be, not just a club tailor–made for my needs.

It’s thrilling to know that we’re getting close to the start of the refurbishment of this building. It’s not been easy – I know it’s something that’s been talked about and worked on for several years before I came to join you. And a number of people have worked especially hard this last year – and I want to thank them, and in particular Colin Chettle, for bringing us to this point. And I thank God and thank you, for the generosity of gifts that have made it worthwhile.
I want us to think about why we’re doing this work, and what it will mean to us. It’s important to do this, not just for ourselves, but for the mission of St Paul’s Church; for God’s mission. I believe that this project is not primarily about making this building more cosy for us, but making it more effective for mission. I believe that it’s about making us more ship-shape for the true purpose of St Paul’s Church.
A refurbished St Paul’s will help us in our worship and in the glorifying of God. It will also help us serve those hundreds of people who use our buildings each week, more effectively, more hospitably.
But there will be little point in our refurbished building, if we content ourselves with the achievement of refurbishment alone. To simply stop at transforming this building will be a failure, unless we are prepared to set sail in faith, so to speak. Lifeboats are for sailing in stormy seas, not for safe moorings – they are built for action. Churches are for mission in a complicated world, for seeking the growing Kingdom of God, for loving service to neighbours, for evangelism and proclamation of the good news of a loving God. Renewing our building for mission must also involve renewing our commitment to being available for challenging mission.


Mark tells us about the time Jesus taught huge crowds on the sea shore. So many people, that Jesus got into a boat and taught the crowds. For the disciples, it was a wonderful day with Jesus. All day long he taught in parables, and when he and the disciples were alone in private, he explained everything clearly.
At the end of that long day, evening came, and as the sky began to darken, Jesus said to his friends, “let’s cross to the other side of the lake”.
Peter, James, John and Andrew were literally in their element. These four fishermen all knew their business. Perhaps their minds had been stretched by all this wonderful teaching. How brilliant that they could now relax and do what they were experts at – sailing a boat for Jesus. Can you imagine Jesus asking you to do something that you’re good at, something well inside your comfort-zone?
So off they set, eastwards into the darkness, Jesus settling down to sleep…
I wonder what looks these disciples exchanged as the waters became choppy. When Matthew the tax-collector and Simon the freedom-fighter asked about the strengthening wind did the fishermen reassure them? When did the expert sailors begin to get nervous? Did they think of turning back to shore? Did they try to find their way to safer, calmer seas?
And when the waves came slopping over the sides, with the boat pitching up and down, with the water inside beginning to rise and panic beginning to spread, who decided to go to the stern to wake Jesus?
“Rabbi! Don’t you care that we’re going to drown? Don’t you fear for our lives?”

Those poor disciples. Still trying to work out who this rabbi Jesus truly is. And today they seem to have their answer. He’s the teacher who asks them to follow him into the storm, where they fear even for their lives. Isn’t it all Jesus’ fault? He chose them and called them, now it seems to he wants to drown them.

The disciples in this passage are modelling for us what sincere but feeble faith looks like. Faith that’s happy to follow Jesus in the sunny, successful parts of his mission can suddenly melt away in the dark and in the storm. In Mark’s gospel, the disciples are never described as having faith. Jesus is thrilled at the faith of the woman with bleeding, the friends of the paralysed man lowered through the roof, the father of the demon-possessed boy. But he never commends his followers for their faith in Mark’s gospel.
It’s as if Mark holds up a mirror for us. As we reflect on the disciples in his gospel, we see ourselves in our weaker moments. Keen to follow Jesus, but all too afraid.
We hear the story of the storm on the lake and we suspect that we might have tried to sail the ship into safer waters, to ignore Jesus’ call to cross to the other side and tie up on the shore because he can’t have been serious and because we know best. Or, when we’re at our wits’ end, to scream to God (who seems to be asleep) “don’t you care about us?”
Jesus, in Mark’s gospel, seems to have chosen disciples who don’t feel up to the task when it really matters. Yet he still believes in them. He still believes in you and me.
Jesus stands up and commands the wind and waves. “Peace! Be still!” The miracle happens, even for these faithless disciples. Jesus is Lord over all. Perhaps if they’d trusted his call, they’d have survived after all. Perhaps Jesus calmed the storm, not to save their lives, but to deal with their fears.

I believe that Jesus’ call to the disciples to push out from the shore, to set sail into less certain waters, is especially relevant to our church right now. I believe that God is calling us to be more mission-minded, more outward-looking, more deliberate and purposeful in the business of evangelism and more serious about living our lives more and more as mature and committed followers of Jesus.
Because I’ve had this feeling about a renewal of our purpose for several months, I booked myself onto a residential course on Church Growth. I spent most of the week before last there. And it was good to recognise many of the strengths of St Paul’s in what was discussed. But I also came back with a greater resolve than I had before. A resolve to do what I can with you to make this church even more ship-shape, not so that we can stay in our comfort zone, but so that we can go where Jesus calls.
There are people in our town who are searching and seeking. Yes, of course the vast majority are satsified with fairly comfortable lives. But a smaller number don’t want to settle for ‘fairly comfortable’. Sometimes it’s illness or bereavement that makes them ask the question, “what more is there than this?” Jesus and, later on the apostles, proclaim the truth that there is a life truly worth living – a life lived with God. They proclaim widely, to thousands. And just a few are interested. Jesus is always interested in the individual.
Sometimes we find it hard to set sail into the mission field because we feel we should save the whole world, and we doubt that we can. We shouldn’t and we can’t – that’s God’s job. Jesus only wanted his disciples to take him to the other side of the lake – where they found just one man to help – the Gerasene man who was out of his mind. Jesus healed him and asked him to tell his neighbours and friends what had happened. Then Jesus returned. It wasn’t a large-scale mission.
Sometimes, it seems to me, Jesus would take us into risky moments, all for the sake of just one soul. Like a shepherd who risked his 99 sheep to find the lost one.
So let’s get our church always ready for action. Let’s get it trimmed for mission, not just for comfort. Let’s be prepared to look at our services, our housegroups, our personal commitment to growing more like Jesus. I’ll be looking for ways of us working together on these issues over the coming months. And if we hear Jesus call us to push out and sail from the safe shore, let’s be the crew that’s ready to slip the moorings and make the adventure happen. Amen.

Can we be sure of eternal life?

Sermon preached at St Paul's Church, Oadby
Sunday 28 May 2006
Hugh James



There is no audio recording of this sermon, but the text is shown below.

...these verses emphasise how much it is God that changes us, rather than that we have changed ourselves. Sometimes, people get worried about that idea. They start to debate the rather sterile argument of whether it’s God’s decision – or my choice - predestination or free will. What's important here is that if God has written his law in our hearts, we will be being changed.


The bible readings used in this sermon are 1 John 5.9-13 and John 16.29-end
.

All over the world there are people trying to break the code – the da Vinci Code - to understand the mysteries of Dan Brown's book. Somehow, they seem to think that this is of some eternal importance. Why?

In another of Dan Brown's book, "Angels and demons” one of the chief characters seizes a bomb that’s about to go off, jumps into a helicopter and climbs into the night sky. He then returns to earth, using a parachute he’s concealed. When he "miraculously” arrives back in Rome unharmed, it is acclaimed a miracle and he is acclaimed Pope by general acclamation! Apparently, in theory, that’s still possible - without the conclave in the Sistine Chapel - and the white smoke.

To say that the story line is far fetched would be a major understatement. So why is one of his other books, the da Vinci code treated so seriously?

Don't get me wrong, if you’re on holiday with a few hours to spare, the novel is a fast romp across most of Europe, with an intriguing, if bloodthirsty, plot. I've read the book, but if the film’s as bad as the critics say, I’m not sure whether I'll be going to see it.

But just being a novel with an exciting plot, doesn't explain why the book has been so popular. I think that it's because it raises the question - in a rather negative way - of "who is Jesus.” Dan Brown is not the first person to have won fame - and money - from suggesting that the Christians’ belief in Jesus is based on a false understanding.

Despite winning the court case that the authors brought, Dan Brown would not deny that many of his ideas were drawn from the book: "Holy Blood, Holy Grail “ by Michael Baigent, Richard Leighn and Henry Lincoln. Their joint idea was that Jesus was just a man – with a family – and descendants today.

Similarly, a previous Bishop of Durham - David Jenkins achieved fame by writing a book questioning Christ’s physical resurrection.

That same question: "who is Jesus,” is central to both our readings this morning.

This is the last of our six-week series in 1 John. And the last verse of our readings today encapsulates John's purpose in writing the letter. He writes: "I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may know that you have eternal life.”

Note that he was writing these things: "to you who believe in the name of the Son of God.” We might have expected that he would have been writing to outsiders, so that they might come to eternal life - or perhaps to sympathetic "God fearers” - people who had begun to realise that their own religion - the Greek gods - could offer nothing, and who needed teaching. But he wasn't. He was writing to Christians.

And he was writing to them so that they: "might know that they have eternal life.” That suggests that John's readers had doubts about their eternal life. Does that ring bells? Do you ever get doubts? It's easy to feel that you couldn't admit to it. What would everyone else say? Isn't it encouraging to find that John is not appalled at their lack of faith. He's expecting it.

We've previously talked about the Gnostic heresy that seems to have been around at the time of the epistle - a heresy that stressed the need for special knowledge. Gnostic comes from Gnosis – G N O S I S – meaning knowledge.

It was a heresy that played upon the same sort of feelings that people had then as those living now, who're chasing the secrets of the da Vinci code. It was a heresy that claimed that a simple belief in the crucified and risen Christ - and in his Spirit - was not enough.

In verse 9 John points out that we are very willing to listen to what humans have to say. We are. We all know how quickly so-called "Urban myths” develop. It's only two months back that half of Birmingham knew – for sure - that an Asian girl had been raped by Black youths. It was believed so strongly - and so widely - and caused such anger - that an innocent black lad, Isiah Young-Sam, was murdered.

That murder would have been tragic in itself - even if he'd been responsible for the rape. It would have been doubly tragic as he had no connection with the rape – which he hadn’t. But in fact, it was many times more tragic, as there seems no evidence at all that any rape took place.

But yes, we're all, all too ready to listen to gossip - to human tittle-tattle. But when God Almighty entrusts his truth to his son, Jesus - come in human form - and talking of the Father. We are very slow to listen.

What do you think John means when he says: "the Father has testified to his son."? I think he's referring to the actions in history – Jesus’ birth, life, teaching, death and resurrection. But there were also several very special occasions, which the disciples would remember particularly well.

There was Jesus’ baptism, when just as Jesus came up from the water, it says:
“suddenly the heavens were opened to him and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and alighting on him. And a voice from heaven said, `This is my Son, the Beloved, with whom I am well pleased.'
Matthew 3:16
Then there was the time when Jesus went up onto the mountain with his closest disciples - and Moses and Elijah appeared, and then a voice came from the cloud and said,
`This is my Son, the Beloved; with him I am well pleased; listen to him!'
Matthew 17:5

And then there were the miracles. And above all there was the resurrection. All of these are God the father's testimony to his son.

That's why the creeds are important. In them, we're saying: "this is how we believe that God has revealed himself to us.” There are many who can't accept them - many in the first century - and many in the 21st. In the da Vinci Code Dan Brown mentions the efforts that the early Christians made to express what they believed be true. Eventually those efforts resulted in the words of what we call: "the Apostles Creed” and the "Nicene Creed.”

Dan Brown makes much of the early Christians’ disagreement. And it's true that at times, it wasn't certain which form of words would be used. But that doesn’t amount to some major conspiracy. As a Christian, I also believe that the Holy Spirit was working and overruling the decisions that were made.

Verse 10 in our passage continues: “Those who believe in the Son of God have the testimony in their hearts.” Some weeks back, we had a series of sermons on: "things that Jesus didn't say” and Steve Carter preached one on: "let Jesus come into your heart.” I wasn't there, but I believe that he was stressing that commitment to Christ was not just an individual thing but had results in one's whole life - changed attitudes and changed actions.

Jesus may not have said: "let me come into your heart '' but what God the Father has promised was that when Jesus came he, the Father, would write his laws in the hearts of the believers. In Jeremiah 31:33 it says: “the Lord says: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.”

That’s what John is echoing: “Those who believe in the Son of God have the testimony in their hearts.”

Once again, those verses emphasise how much it is God that changes us, rather than that we have changed ourselves. Sometimes, people get worried about that idea. They start to debate the rather sterile argument of whether it’s God’s decision – or my choice - predestination or free will. What's important here is that if God has written his law in our hearts, we will be being changed.

We should be able to recognise that difference – recognise that eternal life that starts now. And other people should be able to recognise it too. Much of this letter has been about the difference that a new heart should bring. It has talked about the love that flows from a new heart - a love for God and for others - love that expresses itself in loving actions towards those around.

So, as we look at how we behave, we should be asking: "Have I always been like that?” and: "Would I be like that naturally?” or "Is the spirit of God changing me?” And I hope that the answer for each of us is "yes, I am being changed.”

And if that’s true, it's testifying to two things. It's testifying that you and I are children of God. But it's also testifying that God is God - testifying that his Spirit has the power to change people.

I’m a little bit hesitant in saying what I've just said. I'm hesitant because often it's the wrong people who take it to heart. Those with the most sensitive consciences - people whom everybody around recognise as reflecting the love of Jesus – they are often the same people who’re already conscious of their own inadequacy. And there is a risk that they may be driven into spiritual despondency. I don't want to do that.

But equally, it's often those who least show forth Jesus in their lives, who are least aware of the discrepancy between what they proclaim and what they are. It's for those of us like that, that John has set up the magnificent standard of love in this epistle.

The remaining verses in our passage are even more sombre. They say that to fail to believe in Christ - the Son of God, is to make God a liar. It’s strong language. In our culture - in an age that likes to say: "all routes lead to God” - it will not be popular. The next phrase is equally strong: "whoever does not have the son of God does not have life.”

It's another example where the epistle of John picks up the teaching of the Gospel of John. It reflects John 14:6: “Jesus said to him, `I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.’” These are truths that we cannot escape.

I believe in tolerance. I believe it's important to say: "I will stand up for your right to believe what you do.” - to say: "I believe in your right to express your beliefs - and to worship as you wish.” But that is not the same as saying: "all belief has equal value.”

But there are some who claim that tolerance is not just saying what I did - it's saying: "You are right to do as you do,” whether that be in belief or in lifestyle. To refuse to say that may make us unpopular.

John's epistle was written to Christians who were living in a similar pluralistic world to ourselves- living among a multitude of different religions and philosophies - all of whom claimed the truth. Those Christians must sometimes have had their own doubts. But John concludes:
" I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may know that you have eternal life."

May that be true for us, today





Let us pray

Living Lord,
Thank you for your gift of eternal life,
That you won for us at such cost.
Give us the openings to share it with others,
To your glory. Amen